Your ISNetworld RAVS score is the number that decides whether hiring clients qualify you for work. A low score — or a flagged program — can block you from bidding even after you've paid your annual ISNetworld subscription fee. Yet most contractors don't fully understand how RAVS scoring works until they've already failed a review.

Here's exactly how RAVS scoring works, what reviewers look for, where contractors lose points, and the fastest path to a score that opens doors instead of closing them.

What Is a RAVS Score?

RAVS stands for Review and Verification Services. It's the process ISNetworld uses to evaluate the health, safety, and environmental (HSE) documentation you submit through your contractor account. Your RAVS score is a percentage — typically expressed as a score between 0 and 100 — that reflects how completely and accurately your written safety programs meet the requirements set by ISNetworld and your hiring clients.

When you connect with a hiring client on ISNetworld, the platform generates a customized list of required programs based on two inputs:

  • Your declared scope of work — the trades and activities you marked when setting up your account
  • The hiring client's specific requirements — each operator can add requirements beyond ISNetworld's baseline standard

ISNetworld's RAVS team reviews your submitted programs against these requirements and scores each one. The scores aggregate into your overall RAVS percentage. Hiring clients set their own minimum thresholds — some accept 60%, others require 80% or higher before they'll add you to their approved contractor list.

~90%
of contractors fail their first ISNetworld RAVS review. Every resubmission delay costs you time on the approved contractor list — and time costs contracts.

How RAVS Reviewers Grade Your Programs

ISNetworld employs subject matter experts to review submitted safety programs. These reviewers work from a structured evaluation framework that checks each program for specific required elements. Understanding how they evaluate submissions is the key to improving your score.

The Program-Level Review Process

Each safety program you submit receives an individual review. Reviewers check the following elements for every program:

RAVS Program Evaluation Criteria

  • Program completeness — is this a full, operational written program, or a placeholder/outline? Partial programs are flagged.
  • Company-specific customization — does the program use your actual company name, identify specific responsible parties, and reflect your operations? Generic templates with "[Insert Company Name]" or "[Insert Location]" placeholders fail immediately.
  • Scope alignment — does the program's content match the scope of work you declared? An electrical contractor whose LOTO program doesn't mention arc flash or de-energization of electrical equipment will be flagged regardless of program length.
  • OSHA citation accuracy — each program should reference the applicable 29 CFR standard. Your Fall Protection Program should cite 29 CFR 1926 Subpart M. Your Hazard Communication Program should reference 29 CFR 1926.59 / 1910.1200. Missing or wrong citations lower your score.
  • Required content elements — RAVS has a checklist of required elements per program type. A Confined Space Entry Program needs: written entry procedures, atmospheric testing requirements, attendant responsibilities, and a rescue plan. Missing one element affects your score for that program.
  • Standalone document structure — programs must be submitted as individual files. ISNetworld does not accept a single "safety manual" and ask reviewers to find the relevant sections. Each program is one upload.
  • Currency of standards — programs must reflect current OSHA regulations. A LOTO program citing a regulation that was amended or superseded will be flagged.

How Individual Program Scores Roll Up

ISNetworld doesn't publish its exact scoring algorithm, but the general structure is weighted by program type and hiring client priority. Some programs carry more weight in your overall score — typically the programs most relevant to your declared scope and the highest-risk programs for your trade. A critical safety program (like LOTO for an electrical contractor) missing or failing will have a larger negative impact than a supplemental program.

Hiring clients also have their own overlay. An oil-and-gas operator might weight confined space and H2S programs more heavily than a commercial property owner. This is why two contractors with identical written programs can have different effective RAVS scores with different hiring clients.

Common Deficiency Patterns — Why Scores Stay Low

After reviewing thousands of RAVS submissions, these are the patterns that consistently drag scores down:

1 Generic templates with unfilled placeholders

The single most common failure: buying a safety program template, putting your company name on the cover page, and uploading it. RAVS reviewers catch placeholder text immediately — "[Supervisor Name]", "[Insert Phone Number]", "[Describe specific procedure for your equipment]" are instant flags. A generic template that hasn't been customized to your specific company, equipment, and operations will not pass.

2 Programs that don't reflect your declared trade

If you declared electrical work as your scope, your submitted programs must address electrical hazards. A 50-page safety manual that doesn't mention lockout/tagout for energized electrical equipment fails for an electrical contractor, regardless of what else it covers. RAVS reviewers cross-reference your programs against your declared scope — they're looking for scope-specific content, not volume.

3 Missing required content elements for specific program types

Each program type has a defined set of elements that RAVS checks for. Fall protection programs missing rescue procedures. Confined space programs without atmospheric testing specifications. LOTO programs without equipment-specific procedures. HazCom programs without SDS management procedures. Each missing element is a deficiency that gets noted in the review.

4 Bundled safety manuals instead of standalone programs

Many contractors upload one large PDF that contains everything. RAVS expects individual uploads per program. Your Hazard Communication Program is one file. Your Fall Protection Program is a separate file. Your LOTO Program is another. Uploading a bundled document and expecting reviewers to navigate to the right section results in the entire submission being flagged for restructuring.

5 Questionnaire answers that contradict your written programs

The ISNetworld questionnaire asks about your safety practices and procedures. Your answers must align with your written programs. If your questionnaire says you use personal fall arrest systems, your Fall Protection Program must describe them. Contradictions between your questionnaire and your programs are flagged as consistency issues and scored negatively.

What Written Programs You Need (By Risk Score Impact)

Your required program list is generated by ISNetworld based on your scope and client requirements. But most contractors in general construction trades need a core set of programs regardless of specialization. These are listed roughly in order of scoring impact — missing high-impact programs hits your score hardest:

High Impact

Hazard Communication, LOTO, Fall Protection, Emergency Action Plan, PPE Program

Trade-Critical

Confined Space (if applicable), Electrical Safety, Excavation, Silica Control, Scaffold Safety

Supporting

Heat Illness Prevention, Hearing Conservation, Incident Investigation, Safety Training Program

Client-Specific

Driving Safety, Drug & Alcohol, Environmental Management, Mobile Equipment — varies by hiring client

For a full list of required programs organized by trade, see our guide: ISNetworld Written Programs: Complete List by Trade →

How to Improve Your RAVS Score

1
Pull your required programs list from your ISNetworld dashboard

Log in and go to RAVS. ISNetworld shows you exactly which programs are required and which are flagged. Don't guess what's needed — look at the list. Note which programs are missing entirely vs. which are submitted but flagged for deficiencies.

2
Address missing programs before trying to fix deficient ones

If you're missing programs entirely, those are zero scores. A fully missing program contributes nothing to your RAVS score. Get them written first. A partially compliant program at least contributes partial credit while you work on improvements.

3
Get trade-specific programs — not generic templates

Every program on your list must be customized to your trade, your scope, and your operations. Generic templates fail. Your HazCom program should list your actual chemicals. Your LOTO program should cover your actual equipment types. RAVS reviewers check for scope alignment.

4
Submit each program as a standalone document

One program, one file. Label each upload to match exactly what ISNetworld is asking for. Don't bundle programs into a single safety manual — this creates structural deficiencies that require resubmission regardless of content quality.

5
Align your questionnaire answers with your written programs

After writing or updating your programs, go back through your ISNetworld questionnaire and make sure your answers are consistent. Your questionnaire and your programs are both reviewed — contradictions are flagged.

6
Address the specific deficiencies in the RAVS review notes

When ISNetworld flags a program, the review notes specify what's missing. Read them carefully. Fix exactly what's noted. Don't rewrite the entire program when the reviewer flagged one specific missing element — targeted fixes usually move through review faster.

How Long RAVS Reviews Take

Initial RAVS reviews typically take 1–3 weeks from the date of submission. Resubmissions after deficiency corrections can take another 1–3 weeks per round. This timeline is why contractors who submit incomplete or generic programs pay a significant cost — every resubmission cycle delays their qualification status and potentially delays contract work.

Hiring clients can see your RAVS status in real time. If you're in a resubmission cycle, they see that too. Getting it right the first time — or at minimum the second — matters for your professional reputation on the platform.

The Fastest Path to a Higher RAVS Score

Hire a RAVS Consultant

Cost: $500–$2,000+ per program
Multiple programs: $3,000–$16,000
Timeline: 2–6 weeks
Consultants know RAVS requirements but charge accordingly.

Write Them Yourself

Cost: Free + significant time
Challenge: Requires deep knowledge of both OSHA regulations and ISNetworld's specific review criteria. Most contractors start, get stuck on the citations and required elements, and never finish.

See CrewCompliance Package 1 — Safety Program ($149) →

Related guides: ISNetworld RAVS Documentation Requests — Contractor Guide →  |  First-submission RAVS preparation guide →

Stop losing points on programs that aren't written yet.

Get RAVS-focused safety programs in minutes — customized for your trade, complete with 29 CFR citations, structured as standalone documents for ISNetworld upload. $149 flat, no subscription.

Start Now — $149